wpec9bce45_0f.jpg









wpc8d19c48_0f.jpg

Authors Guidelines

 

Œconomia accepts papers prepared with Word or LateX. LateX users are asked to use babelbst.tex and englbst.tex files and also the bibliographic style file of Oeconomia oeconomiaEN3.bst.  

 

The layout of papers should conform to the style evidenced in the journal. Contributions should be double-spaced (or with wide margins) and written in academic English.

To ensure anonymity of authorship, authors must blind their manuscript by performing the following simple alterations.

1) Authors' names and affiliations must not appear on the title page or elsewhere in the paper.

2) Funding source(s) must not be acknowledged on the title page or elsewhere in the paper.

3) All personal acknowledgments should be omitted. Research group members or other colleagues or collaborators must not be acknowledged anywhere in the paper. There should also be no acknowledgment section in the paper.

Despite the anonymity requirements, authors should still include relevant prior published work of their own in the references (omitting them could potentially reveal your identity by negation).

 

Articles have a separate summary of up to 150 words, which has no references, and does not contain numbers, abbreviations, acronyms or measurements unless essential. The article also contains a list of keywords, and at most three JEL classification codes http://www.aeaweb.org/jel/guide/jel.php.

 

Tables and figures should be given on a separate file, and it is of the responsibility of authors to obtain the permission to reproduce copyright material (either figures or photographs). Authors are requested to correct proofs quickly without revising their article. It is a condition for production and publication of the articles that authors sign a publication agreement, enabling the publisher NecPlus to ensure full copyright protection.

 

All elements necessary to ensure a complete identification (surname and first name, affiliation, address for correspondence, e-mail, title of the article) shall be given directly during the submission process at www.editorialmanager.com/oec.

 

References at the end of the article should respect the following presentation:

 

Chipman, John S., Leonid Hurwicz, Marcel Richter, and Hugo Sonnenschein, (eds). 1971. Preferences, Utility, and Demand. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro. [1897] 1925. The Pure Theory of Monopoly. In vol. 1 of Papers Relating to Political Economy. London: Macmillan.

Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1927. A Statistical Examination of Factors Related to Lamb Prices. Journal of Political Economy, 35(2), 233–60.

Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1933. Some Considerations on the Analysis of the Prices of Competing or Substitute Commodities. Econometrica, 1(2), 172–80.

Gilman, Charlotte Perkins Stetson. [1898] 1998. Women and Economics: A Study of the Economic Relation between Men and Women as a factor in Social Evolution. Boston: Small, Maynard and Company; reprinted with introduction by Carl N. Degler, New York: Harper & Row, 1962; Reprinted with introduction by Michael Kimmel and Amy Aronson, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998.

Jaffé, William (dir.). 1965. Correspondence of Léon Walras and related papers. Amsterdam : North Holland Publishing Company, 3 vols

Tugan-Baranovskij, Mikhail Ivanovich. (1894). Promyshlennye krizisy v sovremennoj Anglii, ikh prichiny i blizhajshie vlijanija na narodnuju zhizn’ (Industrial Crises in Contemporary England, their Causes and Immédiate Influence on Peoples’ Lives). St-Petersburg, Skorokhodov.

Walras, Auguste, et Léon Walras. 1987-2005. Auguste et Léon Walras. Œuvres économiques complètes. Éditées par Pierre Dockès, Pierre-Henri Goutte, Claude Hébert, Claude Mouchot, Jean-Pierre Potier et Jean-Michel Servet, 14 vols, Paris: Economica

Walras, Auguste. [1859-1860] 2005. Lettres 140 à 154. In Walras and Walras (1987-2005), vol. IV : Correspondance, 361-391

Walras, Léon. [1859] 2001. De la propriété intellectuelle. Position de la question économique. Journal des économistes, 24(12) : 392-407. In Walras et Walras (1987-2005), vol. V : L’économie politique et la justice, 513-529

 

 

In the text, the usual presentation conforms the following example:

 

Ezekiel (1927) made one of the first statistical investigations into complementarity. Yet, in 1933, he could still regret that “no one appears as yet to have attempted to formulate clearly the exact way in which they enter into the demand situation.” (Ezekiel, 1933, 173)